Home/Who it's for
Who it's for · segments, sectors, roles

Depth before breadth.

The market rewards whoever is best in a specific context, not whoever covers many sectors equally. Here is who we serve and, at the bottom of the page, who we do not serve yet.

01the situation
Reference segments

It is not the size. It is the situation.

The parameter is not how many people you are, but where knowledge stops today. A structured IT department is not a requirement.

20-250 employees · core target

Knowledge sits in people's heads

What it looks like

Few mapped processes, tools that do not talk to each other, the feeling that every project starts over.

What changes

The first Brain and the first measured process: a verifiable result, not an announced transformation.

Where it starts

A high-volume manual process.

250-1,000 employees · natural extension

The tools are there, but they sit in silos

What it looks like

An IT contact in place, systems already running, several departments producing data nobody has time to cross.

What changes

Orchestration across several Brains, with cross-department conclusions reaching whoever has the overall view.

Where it starts

A case across two departments that barely talk.

regulated sectors · high-requirement cases

Compliance decides before functionality

What it looks like

Explicit confidentiality requirements, a DPO involved from the first conversation, and a no that stops everything.

What changes

A dedicated model or one on your own infrastructure, isolation per organisation, an audit trail on every operation.

Where it starts

A sensitive document process, with separate per-Brain permissions.

02the sector
Sector priorities

Where the ground is most fertile.

These priorities say where it makes sense to begin, not which sectors to cover all at once. The percentages are Eurostat AI adoption data by sector, 2025.

Manufacturing

17.3%AI adoption · Eurostat 2025

A wide base of European SMEs, with repetitive and measurable processes: quality control, order handling, maintenance, quote preparation.

PriorityThe most natural ground for the first vertical case, and the sector of the case we publish.

Professional services

above averageAI adoption · Eurostat 2025

Work where the value is the knowledge itself, and where know-how has to be preserved when people change role or company.

CautionA market more exposed to general-purpose tools: it needs a concrete use case, not a category promise.

Logistics and distribution

11.2%AI adoption · Eurostat 2025

A lot of unexplored ground, with highly repetitive processes: order handling, tracking, transport documentation.

CautionDigital maturity is often lower: it has to be checked case by case whether the minimum tools to connect to exist.

03the role
The map of roles

Who decides, what they ask, what we answer.

The conclusions that come from crossing several Brains serve whoever has the cross-department view. In smaller companies that is often the same person who signs.

CEO or managing director

signs the spend
Wants to hear

A number and a time to break even, not a vision.

The objection they raise

“What does it cost, and when do I see it.”

What we answer

The Proof of Value produces the number before the investment. In the Smart Quoting case: payback in about five months, a working system in six weeks.

COO or operations director

signs off and judges feasibility
Wants to hear

That it starts from a real process, without overhauling the existing stack.

The objection they raise

“How does it fit with what I already have.”

What we answer

Connectors attach to the tools in use through MCP, REST APIs or webhooks. No migration: where there is nothing to attach to, an app is activated on that single process.

Operations manager or department head

champions it and uses it
Wants to hear

That daily work gets simpler, with answers from the right context.

The objection they raise

“I have to change how I work.”

What we answer

For almost everyone the change is that the tools they always used start answering better. A new environment opens only where a process earns it.

CFO or controller

verifies the value over time
Wants to hear

Hours saved and aggregate return, with a method that holds up over time.

The objection they raise

“Whether the claimed savings are real.”

What we answer

The calculation models are versioned: inputs, sources and formula are stated. The return shown in a meeting is still verifiable months later.

DPO or legal

authorises or blocks
Wants to hear

Where the data sits, who accesses what, how every operation is logged.

The objection they raise

“Where does our data end up.”

What we answer

European infrastructure, isolation per organisation, per-Brain permissions and an operations log. No third-party model training on your content.

04when not
Saying it upfront

When we are not the right answer.

A path that does not pay for itself suits neither of us. These are the cases where we say so upfront, rather than discovering it in month three.

If you need something live this afternoon

DBRAINS starts from a mapping. For an immediate answer on a single document a general-purpose tool is faster, and there is no reason to pay for a path.

If the value you want is only document summaries

On reading and summarising, the gap with general-purpose tools has closed. What we add is per-domain permissions and cross-department conclusions: if you do not need those, you do not need us.

If there is no high-volume manual process

The first number comes from there: without volume the return is too small to justify starting, and it shows in the Proof of Value already. Stopping there is a legitimate answer.

Construction, accommodation and food service

They have the lowest AI adoption, so in theory the widest margin. In practice that reflects a digital maturity that slows any platform down: for now they are not among our priorities.

Do you recognise yourself in one of these profiles?

Tell us about your context and a process to start from. We show you what would change, with numbers on your own case.