Data in the EU
Knowledge graph on European infrastructure, with traffic outside the EU minimised.
For many European companies, compliance is the first objection that stops any conversation about AI. It is not a selling point: it is the condition for having the conversation at all.
Process data does not leave the Union. GDPR and the AI Act are part of the architecture, not a layer added afterwards.
Knowledge graph on European infrastructure, with traffic outside the EU minimised.
Who sees and asks what is defined Brain by Brain: one department is not exposed to the others.
Every AI operation is logged, with role-based access control.
No automatic action without supervision: every proposal requires confirmation.
Data segregated per organisation, and no training of public or third-party models.
Explicit control over deletion and export, at any time.
The countdown begins: every European company using AI has a deadline to work towards.
Unacceptable-risk systems become illegal: the first line nobody can cross.
Transparency and documentation for general-purpose models, which everything else rests on.
Anyone interacting with an AI system, or seeing its content, must be able to recognise it.
The Digital Omnibus moved them from August 2026 to December 2027. DBRAINS is designed to meet them already.
Connectors send drafts, reports and structured data, never raw knowledge. Every transfer is logged.
With vertical fine-tuning the model sits on a server dedicated to the customer: training data, model and output all stay there.
We show you in detail where the data lives, who accesses what, and how the architecture answers GDPR and the AI Act.